Prologis was formed by the 2011 merger of AMB Property and Prologis Trust. The company develops, acquires, and operates around 1.3 billion square feet of high-quality industrial and logistics facilities across the globe. The company also has a strategic capital business segment that has around $60 billion of third-party assets under management. The company is organized into four global divisions (Americas, Europe, Asia, and other Americas) and operates as a real estate investment trust.
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in PROLOGIS, INC., comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends.
Returns By Period
PROLOGIS, INC. (PLD) has returned 4.72% so far this year and 38.41% over the past 12 months. Looking at the last ten years, PLD has achieved an annualized return of 11.59%, underperforming the Benchmark (SPY), which averaged 12.23% per year.
PLD
1M-3.01%
6M14.33%
YTD4.72%
1Y38.41%
5Y4.07%
10Y11.59%
Benchmark (SPY)
1M-3.85%
6M-2.35%
YTD-4.36%
1Y34.06%
5Y9.80%
10Y12.23%
Monthly Returns
The table below presents the monthly returns of PROLOGIS, INC. (PLD) with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors.
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2026
2.21%
9.22%
-6.26%
1.51%
2025
12.09%
6.80%
-9.96%
-9.19%
5.15%
-2.54%
1.82%
6.16%
2.02%
8.56%
4.38%
0.05%
2024
-4.63%
5.26%
-2.12%
-21.63%
8.47%
1.39%
12.54%
-0.02%
-0.21%
-10.82%
1.72%
-8.96%
2023
13.42%
-4.40%
2.48%
1.04%
-0.37%
-0.70%
2.57%
-0.25%
-10.52%
-9.79%
13.72%
15.86%
2022
-6.91%
-7.34%
10.05%
-1.12%
-20.80%
-8.34%
12.44%
-5.82%
-17.67%
7.00%
4.98%
-5.31%
2021
3.67%
-4.75%
5.88%
9.11%
0.86%
0.91%
7.11%
4.61%
-7.09%
15.31%
3.75%
10.60%
2020
3.58%
-9.86%
-5.11%
16.72%
4.76%
1.49%
12.72%
-3.43%
-1.10%
-1.71%
-0.67%
-1.17%
2019
19.16%
0.89%
2.70%
6.47%
-3.91%
7.65%
-0.37%
3.85%
2.49%
2.94%
3.82%
-2.55%
2018
0.81%
-6.66%
4.10%
2.75%
-1.21%
1.62%
0.05%
2.97%
1.01%
-4.76%
4.23%
-12.93%
2017
-8.30%
4.52%
1.53%
5.06%
1.81%
5.64%
3.21%
3.75%
0.05%
1.41%
2.52%
-2.85%
2016
3.25%
4.53%
3.44%
11.52%
-2.75%
0.75%
-2.19%
-2.04%
4.14%
Performance Indicators
The charts below present risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROLOGIS, INC. (PLD) and compare them to a Benchmark (SPY). These indicators evaluate an investment's returns against its associated risks.
Sharpe ratio
Sortino ratio
Omega ratio
Calmar ratio
Martin ratio
sharpe ratio
The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.
These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns.
The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of PLD compared to the benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.
Volatility Chart
The current PROLOGIS, INC. volatility is 1.30%, representing the standart deviation of percentage change in the investments's value, either up or down over the past month. The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. It shows the maximum percentage drop from a peak to a trough over a specified period, indicating the risk of significant losses. Although chart shows positive values, it represents the percentage drop from the peak, so a value of 10% means the portfolio has dropped 10% from its highest point.
Income Statement
The income statement provides a summary of a company's revenues, expenses, and profits over a specific period. It shows how much money the company earned (revenues) and how much it spent (expenses), leading to the net income or profit. This statement is crucial for understanding a company's financial performance and profitability.
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Liabilities And Equity (USD)
98.72B
95.33B
93.02B
87.90B
58.49B
56.07B
40.03B
38.42B
29.48B
30.25B
31.39B
25.82B
24.57B
27.31B
27.72B
Equity Attributable To Parent (USD)
53.19B
53.95B
53.18B
53.24B
33.43B
31.97B
22.65B
22.30B
15.63B
14.99B
14.67B
13.98B
13.71B
13.07B
13.66B
Equity Attributable To Noncontrolling Interest (USD)
Dutch pension fund PDN sold 133,600 shares of LXP Industrial Trust (worth $6.4 million) in Q4 2025, reducing its stake to 1.09% of AUM. Despite a recent revenue decline and underperformance versus the S&P 500, the article suggests LXP remains attractive for income investors due to its 5.91% dividend yield and 97% occupancy rate, making the current lower valuation a better buying opportunity than selling.
The Motley Fool•Robert Izquierdo
AI Insight
Listed as the top holding of Pensionfund PDN with $15.13 million (10.0% of AUM), indicating strong institutional confidence in this industrial REIT.
Despite current market volatility, Matt Frankel highlights five dividend stocks that provide stability and allow investors to sleep soundly at night. The article features Prologis and Realty Income among the recommended dividend-paying stocks that maintain strong performance even during uncertain market conditions.
The Motley Fool•Matt Frankel, Cfp
AI Insight
Recommended as a dividend stock worth buying despite market volatility; author owns position and highlights it as providing stability
The Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) offers broad exposure across 158 U.S. REITs with a lower expense ratio (0.13%) and higher dividend yield (3.63%), while the iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF) concentrates on 30 large-cap REITs with a higher expense ratio (0.32%) and lower yield (2.6%). Despite higher costs, ICF has outperformed VNQ over five years, with $1,117 vs. $1,003 growth on a $1,000 investment, driven by its focus on sector leaders in data centers, cell towers, and healthcare properties.
The Motley Fool•Eric Trie
AI Insight
Prologis is noted as a top VNQ holding, but no specific performance commentary is provided in the article.
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) offer different approaches to real estate investing. GQRE charges higher fees (0.45% vs 0.13%) but provides greater global diversification, higher dividend yield (4.3% vs 3.6%), and outperformed VNQ over the past year (7.6% vs 1.6% return). VNQ offers lower costs, superior liquidity, and focuses on U.S.-listed REITs. The choice depends on investor priorities: cost-conscious investors favor VNQ, while income-focused investors seeking global exposure may prefer GQRE.
The Motley Fool•Andy Gould
AI Insight
Listed as a significant holding in both GQRE (0.98%) and VNQ; mentioned for portfolio composition without independent sentiment assessment.
Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) are compared as diversified real estate investment options. VNQ offers larger assets under management ($69.6B), slightly lower fees, and higher dividend yield (3.7%), making it ideal for income-focused investors. REET provides broader global diversification with 325 holdings across developed and emerging markets, delivering superior one-year returns (6.5% vs 1.3%), appealing to growth-oriented investors seeking international exposure.
The Motley Fool•Jake Lerch
AI Insight
Listed as a major holding in both ETF portfolios; included for informational purposes without sentiment assessment.
RWR and RWX are two State Street real estate ETFs with distinct strategies: RWR focuses on U.S. REITs with lower fees (0.25% expense ratio) and $1.8B in AUM, while RWX offers international real estate exposure at higher cost (0.59% expense ratio) with $310.5M in AUM. RWR delivered smaller drawdowns over five years, while RWX posted higher one-year returns. The choice depends on whether investors prioritize cost-efficiency and domestic focus (RWR) or geographic diversification (RWX).
The Motley Fool•Sara Appino
AI Insight
Mentioned as a top holding in RWR (over 24% of assets combined with other top holdings), but no specific sentiment is expressed about the company itself.
The article compares two U.S. REIT ETFs: RWR and ICF. RWR offers broader diversification with nearly 100 holdings, a lower expense ratio (0.25% vs. 0.32%), and a higher dividend yield (3.4% vs. 2.6%), making it more suitable for most long-term investors. ICF is more concentrated with 30 holdings and heavier exposure to large-cap REITs like Equinix and Welltower, appealing to investors seeking conviction in top names but with higher volatility and costs.
The Motley Fool•Andy Gould
AI Insight
Listed as a top holding in RWR's more diversified portfolio. Mentioned as part of broader REIT exposure without specific sentiment.
Realty Income, the largest net lease REIT with a $60 billion market cap and over 15,500 properties, is positioned to maintain its dominant market position over the next decade. The company's size, financial strength, and advantaged access to capital markets provide competitive advantages in sale-leaseback transactions. With a current 5% dividend yield and 31 consecutive annual dividend increases, the company is expected to reach 41 consecutive increases within 10 years, making it a reliable dividend investment for long-term investors.
The Motley Fool•Reuben Gregg Brewer
AI Insight
Prologis is mentioned as a comparable example of REIT sector consolidation, demonstrating dominance in the warehouse niche with a $125 billion market cap. The mention is factual and illustrative rather than prescriptive, used to support the broader trend of large REIT dominance without specific investment recommendation.
The article dismisses AI-driven market panic as unfounded, arguing that AI is a productivity tool that will increase job demand rather than eliminate it. The author recommends closed-end funds (CEFs) holding REITs as a way to gain AI exposure through infrastructure plays like data centers and warehouses, while capturing 8%+ dividend yields. The Nuveen Real Estate Fund (JRS) is highlighted as an attractive opportunity due to its widening discount to net asset value despite underlying portfolio gains.
Investing.com•Michael Foster
AI Insight
Warehouse REIT positioned to benefit from AI-driven automation and manufacturing growth
The article compares two REIT-focused closed-end funds (CEFs) with similar 8%+ yields: Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI). Despite nearly identical holdings and performance, RFI emerges as the better choice due to its current valuation discount relative to its historical premium, offering potential upside as interest rates decline and REITs' borrowing costs decrease.
Investing.com•Michael Foster
AI Insight
Warehouse REIT held in top-10 positions of both funds. No specific commentary provided; mentioned only as a common holding.